Alex at 2009-12-12 17:10:42:
i'm amazed that a studio didn't think of this sooner... it's a terrific idea, low risk, very high rewards. it's like doing R&D on the cheap.
Jeff at 2009-12-12 19:58:13:
Wow. Got one in the bullpen, ready to pop come late March. This is an unexpected surprise.

More studios to follow???
Shea at 2009-12-12 20:38:15:
Some of the best news I've heard all year....about time too
kgmadman at 2009-12-12 23:01:27:
I think when Paramount sees my first-person DV adaptation of "SCRABBLE" they're going to flip their lid.

Assuming, of course, they like watching four drunken guys play Scrabble.
M at 2009-12-13 00:52:36:
Is Paramount shrinking to an Indie company now?

M.
Jim at 2009-12-13 09:09:19:
I had this idea in 1993. Good for them, it's a great movie. Low risk (for them)/high reward potential.
Christian H. at 2009-12-13 11:39:47:
I'd say they should actually have an "up to" clause. I mean, do you know how much Tungsten lights cost?

But it's a great idea. I'll be interested to see how they vet writers and stories.
Ethen with an 'E' at 2009-12-14 11:12:03:
I think Paranormal Activity is the exception to the rule here. What I think we'll find is that all of the other studios will follow suit and we, the audience, will subsequently be bombarded by a slew of terrible low budget movies. Just because they are opening their doors to more possibilities doesn't mean they'll choose quality scripts and produce them in a compelling manner. Thats just my $.02