plinytheelder_t at 2013-01-29 02:34:48:
To me, what's interesting about that interview is the fact that when Lynn & co discuss the Theatrical Experience, what they're really talking about is a social experience rather than a technological one and are truly aware of the distinction.
I know people like Quentin Tarantino have railed on about the purity of projected film as the best way to see film, but imho he's fundamentally wrong for a very simple reason: almost every movie that gets made goes through a digital workflow and is processed and printed digitally.
Digital's eventual dominance over film is inevitable. The following two press releases put the writing on the wall, as far as I'm concerned, as NHK, Japan's national broadcaster starts to transmit 4K content next year (4K is the same resolution as 35mm film) and 8K (70mm film) in 2016:
http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/news/japan-planning-4k-tv-broadcasts-415827
http://www.networkworld.com/news/2013/010613-japan39s-nhk-eyes-8k-tv-265522.html
Regardless of whether we're talking about indie or mainstream, if theaters are to survive and thrive, moviegoing has to be enjoyable and uniquely different from the home viewing experience. Does that mean more IMAX & 3D, more theater chains taking the same approach as Alamo Drafthouse, or something else entirely?