Jacqueline Windh at 2011-11-16 18:52:51:
Well before I make an attempt at the character archetypes, I want to try a bit with the characterization.
I found that Kaufman really developed Joel and Clem’s contrasting personalities very early on in the script, mainly through their dialogue. There was also some VO (from Joel) early on, which I don’t think was actually really necessary (telling when Kaufman was already doing a fine job of showing - but I suppose he was just trying to prepare us for the VO that is more necessary later on when we go more inside his brain and need to hear his thoughts) - e.g. p2 Joel VO tells us “Constitutionally incapable of making eye-contact with a woman I don’t know.” We are seeing that.
But I think the dialogue on the train (p4-12) is brilliant in showing is their contrasting personalities. He doesn’t talk much, when he does it is mumbly and he uses vague words like “nice.” Whereas she is bubbly, aggressive (at least in making the moves to make the conversation happen at all) as well as moody and flighty - being friendly, getting pissed off, becoming apologetic, all in a matter of moments. This long scene really shows us what they are to one another - on one hand how incompatible they are, but on the other how they balance one another out.
As I mentioned before, I thought Stan's entrance (the "boo!" in the office) was brilliant. Nailed him to us in an instant: goofy, not very professional, very casual (or possibly more) with Mary.
OK, as far as the archetypes. I find these archetypes difficult to apply in this film.
Protagonist: Is Joel. Even though Clem is important, Joel is the one whose story we are really following.
Attractor: And Clem is clearly his attractor - very clearly a key to his emotional development.
Nemesis: This is tough. In some ways, Joel is his own nemesis - he is not open or spontaneous, and he ends up becoming pissed off with those aspects of Clem’s personality on their first try at the relationship, rejecting her when really he needs her in his life. But in some ways Clem also becomes his nemesis, being very cruel to him as the relationship deteriorates. Patrick is a nemesis to Joel on the subplot level, but I don’t think so much on the main plot level.
Mentor: Again, tough. But I think the closest to that is Mary. At least by the definition here, being ties to his wisdom, head - because she is the one who delivers the information that both of them need in order to make sense of what happened and what is happening. (She also was in something of a carer role even before hand, as the receptionist who is helping them in their early goals of erasing their memories).
Trickster: I don’t see a character who really fits the Trickster role.
And then the other principal characters seem to be orbiting around Joel’s life. Mierzwiack is just doing his job - fast-tracks Joel for the appointment (so tries to help him) because of the error his company made. But I don’t see him as either a Mentor or a Trickster. Same for Stan - even though he is on the controls for Joel’s erasure, he really has no interest in Joel, he is just doing his job (and barely, at that). Rob and Carrie have only a brief appearance - they try to be supportive helpful friends to Joel, but I wouldn’t call them Mentors to him.
I am curious as to what others have to say here. I don’t think most of the characters in this film really fit in with these archetypes very well.