Scott at 2011-10-25 18:14:17:
That was an interesting read. As noted earlier, I've never seen the 1982 movie, only the original. The two main things that strike me as different -- from what I remember of the 1951 version:
* The 1982 version incorporates fully the idea of the Thing's ability to imitate other life forms. That completely changes the dynamics of the story in which paranoia is a central theme.
* The 1982 version is a decidedly dark story with an heroic, yet fatal ending. That's probably a key factor in the film's under-performance at the box office (only $19M), yet may also be one of the reasons The Thing is rated #167 in the IMDB Top 250, a reflection of an enduring legacy of viewers who found the movie in post-theatrical release life. It's as much a psychological thriller as it is a horror film, gripping on many levels to watch individuals and community devolve. And oh yeah, the Thing kicks some ass, too.
I'll have to work my way through the script a second time to assess its structure, but I must say the script does a great job of building up the suspense, building up the stakes, building and building to a truly cataclysmic ending... and then that dramatic denouement of MacReady and Childs, playing chess and drinking as they await their frozen deaths.
It's a strong read and screenwriter Lancaster does an excellent job creating a visceral sense of reality, some terrific scene description.
More later.